Run the checks. Attach the evidence.
Available repository, API, and browser checks become a clear review record.
How it works
Run the available checks and attach the results for review.
Keep the signal context
To200 keeps the route, request metadata, browser context, and breadcrumbs available from the production issue.
Run verification
After the patch, To200 runs the repository, API, or browser checks available for the change.
Keep the signal context
01To200 keeps the route, request metadata, browser context, and breadcrumbs available from the production issue.
Run verification
02After the patch, To200 runs the repository, API, or browser checks available for the change.
Store evidence
03The result is attached to the task and pull request so reviewers see more than a green build.
Escalate uncertainty
If verification is weak, To200 stops and asks for review instead of pretending it proved the fix.
$ to200 verify --available
signal production error
checks available set
attached results
✓ Check results attached to the PR
In practice
Where checks matter
Checkout and auth flows
Run the available repository, API, or browser checks against the proposed change.
Browser regressions
Use captured route and breadcrumb context to scope the checks reviewers need.
Risky patches
Stop low-confidence fixes before they become reviewer guesswork.
FAQ
Questions, answered.
Does QA swarm replace the test suite?
No. It runs and summarizes the checks available for the change; the evidence is limited to what those checks actually cover.
What happens if verification fails?
The task stays open, the failed verification is recorded, and To200 can continue only within the project autonomy policy.