Skip to content
QA swarm

Run the checks. Attach the evidence.

Available repository, API, and browser checks become a clear review record.

How it works

Run the available checks and attach the results for review.

Keep the signal context

To200 keeps the route, request metadata, browser context, and breadcrumbs available from the production issue.

Verification summary
captured production signal500
available checks
recorded
boundary
auth
data
perf
runtime
Available check results are attached to the task.

Run verification

After the patch, To200 runs the repository, API, or browser checks available for the change.

Repair sequenceregressionevidence

Keep the signal context

01

To200 keeps the route, request metadata, browser context, and breadcrumbs available from the production issue.

Run verification

02

After the patch, To200 runs the repository, API, or browser checks available for the change.

Store evidence

03

The result is attached to the task and pull request so reviewers see more than a green build.

Escalate uncertainty

If verification is weak, To200 stops and asks for review instead of pretending it proved the fix.

Verification

$ to200 verify --available

signal production error

checks available set

attached results

✓ Check results attached to the PR

In practice

Where checks matter

Checkout and auth flows

Run the available repository, API, or browser checks against the proposed change.

Browser regressions

Use captured route and breadcrumb context to scope the checks reviewers need.

Risky patches

Stop low-confidence fixes before they become reviewer guesswork.

FAQ

Questions, answered.

Does QA swarm replace the test suite?

No. It runs and summarizes the checks available for the change; the evidence is limited to what those checks actually cover.

What happens if verification fails?

The task stays open, the failed verification is recorded, and To200 can continue only within the project autonomy policy.